Ten years ago this month, the review that planned this network was published. In the time it then took Greater Cambridge to appoint the consultants who would design its routes, Copenhagen's equivalent partnership of councils built a finished cycle route connecting one of its towns to the capital. A decade on, Greater Cambridge has finished one route of twelve.

Finish the Greenways

The diagnosis

Why it happened

Nobody set out to build a worse network. Three systems — consultation, legal challenge and land assembly — combined so that the easy parts got built and the important parts did not. None of the three is impossible to fix.

01

Consultation without delivery

Every corridor has been consulted at least twice on its alignment — village engagement in 2017–18, formal consultation in 2019, updated plans in 2022 or 2023 — and several have been consulted a third time since. The Bottisham route's Riverside section went out to consultation as recently as June 2026, seven years after the corridor was first put to the public.

Support has been consistently high. Over 80% of respondents said they would use their local greenway. Fulbourn's consultation reached 9,600 households; Sawston's and Melbourn's reached 6,000 each. The public has not been the obstacle.

But repetition has a cost. Each round reopens questions that were settled, resets the programme clock, and — most corrosively — teaches people that being asked is not connected to anything being built. The Fulbourn business case named 2026 as its opening year. As this is written, in September 2026, phase 1 resurfacing has not been confirmed complete, phase 2's promised early-2026 consultation has not been confirmed as launched, and phase 3 remains in design following a re-route agreed in spring 2025. No revised opening date has been published. GCP's own monthly Greenways updates, which report other routes in detail, have not mentioned Fulbourn since December 2025 — the deadline has passed in silence, not in public account.

Consultation is how consent is built. Spent without delivery, it is how consent is lost.

02

A challenge that changed nothing

In June 2022 the Greater Cambridge Partnership met Grantchester Parish Council about routing the Haslingfield greenway through the village. On 17 October 2022 there was a further meeting, attended by the leader of South Cambridgeshire District Council and the GCP's head of transport. What was said at that meeting became the entire subject of a High Court case.

The parish council understood it had been promised the route would not proceed through the village if residents opposed it. A village survey returned 73% against. The wider consultation returned 64% in favour. On 11 December 2023 the Joint Assembly recommended the through-village route, and on 4 January 2024 the Executive Board confirmed it.

On 3 April 2024 the parish council filed for judicial review. The case was heard over three days in March 2025, with live evidence and cross-examination on what had been said in an unminuted meeting two and a half years earlier. On 14 April 2025 Mrs Justice Lieven dismissed it on every ground, finding no promise of the necessary clarity had been made, and holding that a single councillor cannot bind a joint committee of four authorities in any event.

Decision to judgment: fifteen months. Change to the scheme: none.

R (Grantchester Parish Council) v Greater Cambridge Partnership [2025] EWHC 923 (Admin). The claim failed in full — but the delay was real, and it was the delay that mattered.

The right to challenge a public authority is not the problem, and this site does not argue for removing it. Two narrower things went wrong. First, the meeting was never minuted, so a dispute about a conversation became a dispute that only cross-examination could resolve. Second, a greenway can be contested at four separate stages — consultation, planning, the traffic regulation order, and judicial review — spread over years, with no point at which the alignment becomes settled. Major transport schemes do not work this way.

03

Land: the decisive one

The 2016 review was explicit that land was the thing that would decide everything else. It recommended starting negotiations immediately and running them across the whole network at once, because the same landowners appear on different routes. That never happened. Land has been negotiated scheme by scheme, and landowner consent is still the stated blocker on Waterbeach, Swaffham, Bottisham and Haslingfield today.

What makes this hard to defend is that the powers exist and are used freely — just not for cycling. Cambridgeshire County Council holds compulsory purchase powers under sections 239, 240, 249 and 250 of the Highways Act 1980, and used them to assemble land for the Huntingdon link road, making that order in January 2011. The county's single best cycle route, the nineteen-kilometre busway path, exists because the Guided Busway's 2005 Transport and Works Act Order took the corridor compulsorily. Cambridge South East Transport is currently heading for a public inquiry under the same Act.

For the greenways, the method was voluntary agreement, and nothing else.

Compulsory powers are deployed readily for roads and busways. For walking and cycling they are almost never used at all.

Asked under freedom of information whether it had ever used compulsory purchase to deliver a traffic-free walking or cycling path, Lincolnshire County Council could list only road schemes. One county is not a national survey — but it matches the pattern here exactly.

There is no legal obstacle to doing otherwise. The government's own compulsory purchase guidance states that authorities may begin formal procedures in parallel with continuing negotiations, rather than waiting for talks to fail. The test is a compelling case in the public interest and reasonable efforts to acquire by agreement first. A route adopted in the local plan, consulted on three times, and stalled for a decade would meet it.

Instead, land cost became a reason to delete things. The Ditton Lane underpass was dropped partly on land acquisition cost. The Sawston railway link and the St Ives Over spur are paused on construction cost. When land has no budget line and no fallback power, descoping is the only lever left.

A 42km rural cycle trail across dozens of Irish farms was built in about two years — by asking, not compelling.

County Mayo's Great Western Greenway secured its route entirely through voluntary agreement with individual landowners along a disused railway corridor: the first section opened in 2010, the full 42km by 2011. A 2026 review of Irish greenways found routes like this — following an existing corridor, agreed voluntarily — succeed quickly, while routes that rely on compulsory purchase or cut through active farmland are the ones that stall for years. It's a reason to use compulsory powers as the backstop this site argues for, not the first resort — voluntary agreement along a natural corridor is still the fastest route of all, when landowners are willing.

Sources: Great Western Greenway — official site (Mayo County Council) · Irish Times, 30 March 2026 — "Greenways of Ireland: why some routes succeed and others fail"

What would fix it →